READ THIS: PRESENTATIONS

PRESENTATIONS: please take these seriously: they are an important part of your participation in the class. Your job when you present is to lead the discussion on the reading for that day. You may bring in some research, but most of all, you should be very well-prepared with insights, interpretations, and questions about the reading at hand. You may want to begin by summarizing the progress of the plot represented by the excerpt assigned on that day. Then you should have passages picked out for the class to discuss. You may want to be ready, also, with the posts for the day (you can copy and paste them and print them out). The purpose of the presentation is to give more responsibility to the classmembers and de-center the discussion a little bit (although I will still chime in). Here are your assignments, mostly random. 1. Wed. 3/30 Small Things, 84-147, Eidia. 2. 4/4 Small Things, 148-225, Hannah. 3. 4/6 Small Things, ending, Anna. 4. 4/11 Ondaatje, Dan. 5. 4/13 Mukherjee, Michael. 6. 4/18 Poppies, 3-87, Karol. 7. 4/20 Poppies, 88-156, Jason. 8. 4/25 Poppies, 157-226, Joe. 9. 4/27, Poppies, 227-342, Will. 10. 5/2 Poppies, 343-446, Rachel. 11. 5/4 Poppies, finish, Jane.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Rachel - Mistry, 3/21

"The Collectors..."  Wow.  Have to admit, I really the anti-consumerist theme in this piece.  (Being a 100% stereotypical New Schooler, however, I tend to think almost ALL writing has an anti-consumerist message, and therefore, has something critical to say.  Biased thinking, w00t.)

I know this post is supposed to comment on a distinctly "South Asian" theme within literature.  However, I think this is somewhat...impossible to do.  While culture and race are powerful factors that alter our perceptions of the world, I think human animals are - at the end of the day - human animals, and they will inevitably focus on the same themes.  In the 21st century, anti-consumerism is something we're fixated on, as a species.  This holds especially true in South Asian countries like Cambodia and India, where the trauma of 19th century genocide or colonialism has not been completely processed.

In Mistry's story, we see a wealthy veterinarian in his house, living with his car, stamp collection, and obnoxious son.  But this character is juxtaposed with beggars on the street, who pick food out of primary school garbage cans once students have finished their lunch hour.

In "The Collectors," the stamp collection symbolizes a material luxury.  It is something that brings the owner pleasure, but is not necessary for survival.  Jehangir even steals stamps so his collection may grow; while this brings him material comfort, it costs store owners their livelihoods.  It shows the class conflict that exists in present day India; at the moment, there are huge gaps between the intelligentsia and the "untouchable" caste.  This is one theme I've been seeing throughout this course, and I would imagine that it will be likewise explored in the next two books we're about to read.  And that's a good thing.

I think it is essential that class differences be grappled with in literature.  I think (and Rushdie would probably agree) that opening a literary dialog is one of the best ways for a culture to absorb the aftershock of trauma.  Whether it's trauma caused by colonialism, loss of culture, war, or poverty, a discourse needs to be opened up.

Good job, Mistry!

No comments:

Post a Comment