READ THIS: PRESENTATIONS

PRESENTATIONS: please take these seriously: they are an important part of your participation in the class. Your job when you present is to lead the discussion on the reading for that day. You may bring in some research, but most of all, you should be very well-prepared with insights, interpretations, and questions about the reading at hand. You may want to begin by summarizing the progress of the plot represented by the excerpt assigned on that day. Then you should have passages picked out for the class to discuss. You may want to be ready, also, with the posts for the day (you can copy and paste them and print them out). The purpose of the presentation is to give more responsibility to the classmembers and de-center the discussion a little bit (although I will still chime in). Here are your assignments, mostly random. 1. Wed. 3/30 Small Things, 84-147, Eidia. 2. 4/4 Small Things, 148-225, Hannah. 3. 4/6 Small Things, ending, Anna. 4. 4/11 Ondaatje, Dan. 5. 4/13 Mukherjee, Michael. 6. 4/18 Poppies, 3-87, Karol. 7. 4/20 Poppies, 88-156, Jason. 8. 4/25 Poppies, 157-226, Joe. 9. 4/27, Poppies, 227-342, Will. 10. 5/2 Poppies, 343-446, Rachel. 11. 5/4 Poppies, finish, Jane.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Joseph-Lahiri-3/22




Jhumpa Lahiri is a more streamlined, overtly empathetic author than the ones we have read so far. There are a lot of convenient signs to unpack here. For example, upon noticing the Christian paraphernalia, Lahiri writes that it is “roughly the same size as the vinegar bottle in the other”, surely not an accidental contrast detail. Like the Misty story, an object binds yet separates these two people. In both stories, interests are together on the surface, but the really important ones divide them.  Sajeev and Twinkie both like P.G Wodehouse, but that’s hardly an indicator of a compatible relationship. The divisions between them are numerous. In “The Blessed House”, Sajeev needs to not only go through every composer (to find a classical music listener is rarer than ever nowadays, and it’s comical that he can’t see the value of items that can’t be put to immediate use); he has to do it in alphabetical order. This highlights the absurdity of his stubbornness.  It would appear that Twinkle has a more layered identity, one that her husband cannot accept.  She appears to be the one with a more stable sense of self, despite being portrayed as “lackadaisical” and the husband being portrayed as fully there. Identity in Lahiri’s story is less concerned with politics and more with empathy, it seems (the vinegar soon turns into water, and in the scene with the blue mask Twinkle is portrayed as a kind of Madonna). Perhaps the largest set political or societal construction of identity is the rather quick marriage. Only after they are married does it appear that they can begin constructing real, more fluid identities; and arrive at the state of grace that the day of marriage is supposed to create.  It is interesting to contemplate whether the ultimate acceptance of these important disparate interests is a matter of pity or love, or perhaps a bit of both. 

No comments:

Post a Comment