It's becoming obvious that this book has a specific and familiar political bent, and key scenes are best read with this in mind. Although we've touched on it, the discussion between Burnham and Zachary is key to the book. You can focus on Burnham's attitude's and beliefs: is he a plausible character or an exaggerated villain? Of particular interest is Burnham's attitude towards slavery. Also, Zachary's eagerness to please. Or you can focus on Burnham's explanation of the business and the future of the boat. Also worthy of notice is Deeti's intimate encounter with the unconscious and simple-minded Kalua: what is the symbolism of this scene and Kalua's character? When Neel thinks of Burnham's approaching visit, much is explained about the relationship between the Rajas and the English businessmen. Then at the dinner scene - maybe the most important in the book theme-wise - we learn more about Burnham's philosophy. Discuss the political implications of his arguments about free trade and opium. What kind of character is Neel - as seen in the dinner scene with Burnham and Doughty? How is he different from his father? Surely, he, too, is an "oppressor" of sorts, since he is in the position of a fedual lord. So, how does he fit into the morality of the book? The relationship of Dobi and Paulette must remind us of other relationships in other books. Also, to back up a bit, the description of the opium factory when Deeti goes there has strong political implications.
Pick any of these things for your post. Are the characters essentially helpless, or are they more like Dickens characters: striving in spite of great odds and powerful forces? Is this closer to the traditional novel? Which characters seem to be the scheming puppet masters who make things happen? Is it more the powerful men or those associated with the laboring classes?
No comments:
Post a Comment